Rendered at 08:02:15 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
felixlu2026 1 hours ago [-]
generating docs is the easy part. keeping stale docs from becoming “truth” is the real problem.
rrvsh 8 hours ago [-]
maintaining an LLM wiki has been a lot more effort than I thought, at least if we are trying to maintain a high quality in structure and writing comprehension (for easier lookups both for the agent and human). Are people just shotgunning their agent wikis or how
bad_username 3 hours ago [-]
> maintaining an LLM wiki has been a lot more effort than I thought
Same here. Wikis start out good, but either devolve in a journal-y mess after a while and many updates, or require constant expensive rewrites. (I didn't use the software of the OP.)
TeeWEE 4 hours ago [-]
This is mostly a thin clintypescript wrapper around the prompts.
This could have been a SKILL
dcreater 9 hours ago [-]
What does this do better than just asking your agent to "write docs" or a more robustly defined prompt/skill?
capplexham 5 hours ago [-]
Have a look at the prompts in the GitHub [0]. It defines a System Prompt and specifies the documentation structure. This would allow you to switch coding agents, instead of relying on how your coding agent interprets the command "write docs".
I swear most of these tools are made for the sake of it…
While good old prompting is often better than plan mode or superpower skills.
_pdp_ 8 hours ago [-]
This is what we do. The same agent writing the code can also write the docs.
mthoms 3 hours ago [-]
We need to make an effort to distinguish “this is a thing for humans” vs “this is a thing for bots” in our naming IMHO. In that respect, “open wiki” is not such a great name. “Agent Wiki” or similar would be better.
Without such a qualifier, “wiki” carries a strong connotation of (usually collaborative) human involvement. That’s literally what it’s famous for.
Thats just my $0.02 on the naming. I definitely think it’s a worthwhile idea. All the best.
Same here. Wikis start out good, but either devolve in a journal-y mess after a while and many updates, or require constant expensive rewrites. (I didn't use the software of the OP.)
This could have been a SKILL
[0]: https://github.com/langchain-ai/openwiki/blob/main/src/agent...
While good old prompting is often better than plan mode or superpower skills.
Without such a qualifier, “wiki” carries a strong connotation of (usually collaborative) human involvement. That’s literally what it’s famous for.
Thats just my $0.02 on the naming. I definitely think it’s a worthwhile idea. All the best.